Main Article Content

Abstract

BACKGROUND


Evaluation of intra-abdominal/intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in the absence of enlarged peripheral nodes has always been a challenging problem for clinicians, especially with unfavourable general conditions of the patient where surgical interventions are difficult. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA has been used for the last two decades for tissue acquisition from patients with such deep-seated lesions. But its use in the diagnosis of lymphoma has always been challenging. However, the addition of fine needle core biopsy into this procedure has given promising results. In this study, we wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of EUS-FNA/FNB as an alternative to invasive open surgical procedures.


METHODS


We exhibit a case series of 6 patients who presented with mediastinal and/ or intraabdominal lymphadenopathy in whom EUS-FNA & FNB were done simultaneously to obtain tissue for histological and ancillary studies.


RESULTS


Clinically these lymph nodes were detected by CECT and there was no peripheral lymphadenopathy. In this case series, we were able to make a diagnosis of lymphoma in all 6 cases. With the help of immunohistochemistry, 2 cases were further classified into Hodgkin’s lymphoma and one case was diagnosed as ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma. All three patients underwent treatment from our hospital and are on follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS


Our experience with this case series report suggests that EUS-FNA/FNB is a minimally invasive procedure which can be tried effectively as an alternative to invasive open surgical procedures.

Keywords

FNB, Echo Endoscope, Immunohistochemistry, Lymphomas.

Article Details

How to Cite
Deepak Johnson, Ajitha Kumari, Asha Punnoose, Sany Philip, & George Chandy Mattethra. (2022). Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Combined with Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) in the Diagnosis and Subclassification of Deep-Seated Lymphomas - Report of a Case Series and Review of Literature. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 11(10), 840–844. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v11i10.228

References

  1. Cafferty LL, Katz RL, Ordonez NG, et al. Fine needle aspiration diagnosis of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal lymphomas by a morphologic and immunocytochemical approach. Cancer 1990;65(1):72-7.
  2. Meda BA, Buss DH, Woodruff RD, et al. Diagnosis and subclassification of primary and recurrent lymphoma. The usefulness and limitations of combined fine-needle aspiration cytomorphology and flow cytometry. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;113(5):688-99.
  3. Jin M, Wakely PE. FNA diagnosis of deep-seated lymphoma: an institutional experience. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2017;6(3):114-9.
  4. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histologyneedle: results from a multicenter,pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73(6):1189-96.
  5. Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, et al. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guidedtrucut biopsy needle compared with EUS guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57(1):101-6.
  6. Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105(8):1739-45.
  7. Caraway NP. Evolving role of FNA biopsy in diagnosing lymphoma: past, present, and future. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123(7):389-93.
  8. Jin M, Wakely PE. Endoscopic/endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and ancillary techniques, particularly flow cytometry, in diagnosing deep-seated lymphomas. Acta Cytologica 2016;60(4):326-35.