Main Article Content
Abstract
In the present-day scenario, congenital abnormalities and genetic syndromes are increasing due to conceptions in extremes of age groups (teenage pregnancy and elderly primi gravidas), which is about 0.8 to 2.9%. Since our hospital is situated in the periphery, consanguinity persists.
In our tertiary care center, we terminate many cases of abnormal fetuses. Here we are presenting one such interesting case scenario.
In today's world, where women's access to education is continuously improving, societal trends are shifting, and one notable change has been a decline in consanguineous marriages. Consanguineous marriages, or marriages between closely related individuals, have historically been more common in certain cultures, but the increasing level of female education and awareness of the potential genetic risks associated with these unions has led to a noticeable reduction in their occurrence. This is a positive shift, as consanguineous marriages have been linked to a higher risk of genetic disorders in offspring due to the increased likelihood of inheriting recessive genetic conditions.
In tandem with these social changes, advancements in medical technology have significantly improved prenatal care. Fetal medicine specialists now employ a variety of cutting-edge diagnostic tools to identify potential genetic and structural abnormalities in a fetus as early as possible. Among the most notable of these technologies are NIPT (Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing) and the TIFFA (Targeted Imaging for Fetal Anomalies) scan. NIPT is a blood test that analyzes small fragments of fetal DNA circulating in the mother's blood, providing a safe and highly accurate method for detecting chromosomal abnormalities, such as Down syndrome, as early as 10 weeks of pregnancy. Meanwhile, the TIFFA scan is a more advanced ultrasound technique used to identify gross anatomical abnormalities in the fetus, offering detailed insights into the fetal development during the second trimester. These technologies, along with others, have revolutionized prenatal care by enabling early intervention, counselling, and decision-making based on a more accurate understanding of potential risks.
Despite the tremendous progress made in the field of fetal medicine, the detection and prevention of genetic abnormalities are not flawless, and cases of genetic disorders continue to emerge. The present case we are discussing serves as a poignant reminder that, even with the most advanced screening methods available, some conditions may still go undetected or may not be entirely preventable. The case highlights the complexity of genetic inheritance and the limitations of current diagnostic tools, underlining the importance of continued research and development in prenatal care.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
- Saxena M, Hungund B. Single umbilical artery and associated birth defects in perinatal autopsies: prenatal diagnosis and management. J Pathol Transl Med 2024;58(5):214-8.
- Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Dodds L, Joseph KS, et al. Single Umbilical Artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(4):843-50.
- Christensen KM, Heilbrun ME, Patel N, et al. Estimated Fetal Weight and Birth Weight associated with isolated single umbilical artery. Ultrasound Quarterly 2015;31(1):19-22.
- Chow JS, Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Frequency and nature of structural anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical arteries. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17(12):765-8.
- Tasha I, Brook R, Frasure H, et al. Prenatal detection of cardiac anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical artery: diagnostic accuracy comparison of maternal-fetal-medicine and pediatric cardiologist. J Pregnancy 2014;265421.
- Ebbing C, Kessler J, Moster D, et al. Single Umbilical Artery and risk of congenital malformation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2019;55(4):510-5.
- Shah N. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: incidence, counseling and management in Indian scenario. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2018;68(6):437-9.
- Yu J, Wu Q, Kong F, et al. Diagnosis of single umbilical artery and risk of foetal congenital malformations by prenatal ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2024;24(1):193.
- Nayak SS, Shukla A, Girisha KM. Anomalies associated with single umbilical artery at perinatal autopsy. Indian Pediatrics 2015;52:73-4.
- Karimi Rouzbahani A, Zarrinkoub N, Mahmoudvand G, et al. Single umbilical artery leading to intrauterine growth restriction: a case report. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2024;9(1):110-3.
References
Saxena M, Hungund B. Single umbilical artery and associated birth defects in perinatal autopsies: prenatal diagnosis and management. J Pathol Transl Med 2024;58(5):214-8.
Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Dodds L, Joseph KS, et al. Single Umbilical Artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(4):843-50.
Christensen KM, Heilbrun ME, Patel N, et al. Estimated Fetal Weight and Birth Weight associated with isolated single umbilical artery. Ultrasound Quarterly 2015;31(1):19-22.
Chow JS, Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Frequency and nature of structural anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical arteries. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17(12):765-8.
Tasha I, Brook R, Frasure H, et al. Prenatal detection of cardiac anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical artery: diagnostic accuracy comparison of maternal-fetal-medicine and pediatric cardiologist. J Pregnancy 2014;265421.
Ebbing C, Kessler J, Moster D, et al. Single Umbilical Artery and risk of congenital malformation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2019;55(4):510-5.
Shah N. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: incidence, counseling and management in Indian scenario. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2018;68(6):437-9.
Yu J, Wu Q, Kong F, et al. Diagnosis of single umbilical artery and risk of foetal congenital malformations by prenatal ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2024;24(1):193.
Nayak SS, Shukla A, Girisha KM. Anomalies associated with single umbilical artery at perinatal autopsy. Indian Pediatrics 2015;52:73-4.
Karimi Rouzbahani A, Zarrinkoub N, Mahmoudvand G, et al. Single umbilical artery leading to intrauterine growth restriction: a case report. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2024;9(1):110-3.